Meeting Date
|
Documents
|
---|---|
February 2, 2015
|
|
October 13, 2014
|
Agenda I (PDF)
Agenda II (PDF)
Agenda III (PDF)
Minutes (PDF)
Proposal (PDF)
|
August 18, 2014
|
Agenda I (PDF)
Agenda II (PDF)
Agenda II (PDF)
Agenda IV (PDF)
Minutes (PDF)
|
Educational Affairs Committee
The Educational Affairs Committee (EAC), one of the standing committees of the University Council, considers and recommends educational policies to the University Council and also hears student appeals on academic matters.
Meeting Dates and Deadlines
Please select an academic year below to view the dates, deadlines, and documents for meetings occuring that year.
2024 - 2025 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 - 2024 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 - 2023 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 - 2022 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 - 2021 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 - 2020 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 - 2019 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 - 2018 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 - 2017 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 - 2016 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 - 2015 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 - 2014 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 - 2013 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 - 2012 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 - 2011 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 - 2010 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 - 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 - 2008 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 - 2007 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 - 2006 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 - 2005 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 - 2004 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 - 2003 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 - 2002 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2000 - 2001 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 - 2000 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 - 1999 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 - 1998 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 - 1997 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 - 1996 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1994 - 1995 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1993 - 1994 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1992 - 1993 | No Documents Available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1991 - 1992 | No Documents Available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1990 - 1991 |
|
* Approved and Forwarded to University Council
Bylaws and Policies
Section 4.05-01
Academic Appeals at the University of Georgia Policy
Policy
Specific procedures exist at the University of Georgia for students who wish to appeal
a decision on an academic matter. At the university level, the Educational Affairs
Committee of the University Council considers students' petitions and appeals. Excluded
from these procedures is any allegation involving discrimination or harassment in
violation of the University of Georgia Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policyand the University of Georgia Sexual Orientation Policy. Those matters shall be referred to the Equal Opportunity Office.
The policy and procedures used in the academic appeal process follows.
Implementation
The Bylaws of the University Council of the University of Georgia give authority to
the Educational Affairs Committee to hear student appeals on academic matters. The
Bulletin specifies that the Educational Affairs Committee (EAC) shall have authority
to readmit students following second dismissal from the institution. The Bylaws specify
that the Committee will hear appeals on academic matters generally and, in addition,
have special responsibility for hearing appeals on academic matters emanating from
the Division of Academic Enhancement and grade appeals from throughout the institution.
The following procedures have been developed since the establishment of the Educational Affairs Committee in 1975. They are organized with respect to the types of appeals assigned to the Educational Affairs Committee.
- Subcommittee on Petitions
- The Educational Affairs Committee processes student appeals through its subcommittee on petitions. This subcommittee has existed since the creation of the Educational Affairs Committee in 1975.
- The subcommittee on petitions will be comprised of three faculty members from the EAC. In an emergency situation or during those periods when the members of the subcommittee may be absent from campus, the chair or delegate staff member in the Office of Instruction is empowered to confer with one or more members of the entire committee and to render a decision jointly. Such decisions will be reported to the full committee at the next meeting of the EAC.
- The designated staff member in the Office of Instruction shall assemble the appropriate documents pertaining to the appeal in question and make these available to the committee members prior to the meeting. It is also the responsibility of the designated staff member to seek legal counsel should it be required.
- The chair of EAC will prepare a written response for the student which will include the subcommittee's rationale in reaching its decision.
- The records of the subcommittee on petitions including the student files and other pertinent materials will be maintained in the Office of Instruction.
- Appeals after Second Dismissal
- The EAC subcommittee on petitions will hear all such appeals. Additionally, petitions will be reviewed expeditiously at times to be determined by the chair. Normally, the subcommittee on petitions will hear appeals once a month.
- When a petition is received, the designated staff member in the Office of Instruction will assemble the necessary supporting documents, including a recommendation from the dean of the school or college from which the student has been dismissed.
- Students readmitted after second dismissal are placed on continued probation as defined in the Bulletin.
- In exceptional circumstances, as determined by the subcommittee, the subcommittee on petitions may hear appeals from students who have not fulfilled the requirement of being absent from the institution for one calendar year.
- Appeals from First Dismissal
Appeals from students who are seeking reinstatement after first dismissal are decided by the dean of the school/college of the student’s major. In cases where such an appeal comes to the committee, the same procedures will be followed as are followed regarding second dismissal. - Appeals from the Division of Academic Enhancement
- All appeals for readmission to the University following the dismissal of Learning Support students are referred to the EAC subcommittee on petitions. Each case must be considered within the regulations of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. By action of the Vice President for Instruction, a Learning Support student dismissed from the institution may petition for readmission to the University of Georgia per the current policy governing student application for readmission. Upon receipt of a petition, the Office of Instruction will seek a recommendation from the Director of the Division of Academic Enhancement.
- All Learning Support students readmitted after dismissal will be placed on scholastic probation and must meet the standards for retention as described in the UGA Bulletin. Students who do not meet these standards are placed on second dismissal from the University. Any other academic appeals from the Division of Academic Enhancement will be heard only after they have been reviewed by the appropriate committee within the Division of Academic Enhancement. They will be treated in the same manner as appeals coming from the schools or colleges.
- Grade Appeals
The EAC subcommittee on petitions considers student grade appeals. The petition of the student should state clearly the grade which the student believes should be assigned to the work or course in question and why that grade is more appropriate than the one which was assigned. Grade appeals must originate with the instructor who assigned the grade. If the instructor will not change the grade, an appeal should be made to the chair of the department in which the course was taken (or in non-departmental schools/colleges, in the school/college in which the course was taken). If the matter is not resolved to the student's satisfaction at that level, the petition should then be directed to the school/college in which the department is located, except for graduate students, who will appeal any grade in a graduate course from the department or school to the Graduate School. Students may appeal decisions of college or schools to the Educational Affairs Committee. Appeals will follow the Hearing Procedures described in Section 4.05-02 of the General Academic Policy: Student Appeals. All grade appeals must be initiated within one calendar year from the end of the term in which the grade was recorded. In all grade appeals, the designated staff member in the Office of Instruction shall request copies of all material reviewed by the school/college committee that reviewed the student’s grade appeal. In addition, the faculty member who assigned the student’s final grade will receive a copy of the student’s letter of appeal and be given the opportunity to provide a response to the appeal for the subcommittee members.
If the faculty member who assigned the student’s grade is no longer employed by UGA or if reasonable attempts to contact him/her are unsuccessful, the copy of the student's letter of appeal will be referred to the department head, who will be given the opportunity to provide a response to the appeal on behalf of the department. If the faculty member has left the University, a copy of the Petition Subcommittee decision will be mailed to the department head.
Ordinarily, grades are assigned solely at the discretion of the instructor. The petition of the student should state clearly the grade that the student believes should be assigned to the coruse in question and why the grade is more appropriate than the one that was assigned. A primary criterion for a successful grade appeal is the demonstration either that the grade was the result of a factual error or that it was influenced by improper or unprofessional bias on the part of the instructor. - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act
Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, a student may request that the custodian of his/her academic record amend the record if the student believes it contains information that is inaccurate or misleading. If the custodian decides not to amend the record as requested, the student may file a petition with the committee to challenge the content of the record. - Other Academic Appeals and Requests
- The committee occasionally receives petitions from students concerning waivers of various school/college and University requirements. All petitions concerning waivers of academic requirements are referred to the petitions subcommittee. The designated staff member in the Office of Instruction is responsible for assembling these files and for seeking recommendations from the appropriate dean.
- Cases involving students who have been certified as disabled by the University of Georgia Disability Resource Center will be heard by the subcommittee. These cases frequently involve requets to waive or substitute requirements as a result of a learning disability.
- Posthumous Degrees
In appropriate circumstances, the University of Georgia may honor an undergraduate student by granting a degree posthumously. This status will be reserved for those students who have made substantial progress toward their degrees as outlined below. The procedure for granting a degree posthumously will be as follows:- The deceased student will be recommended for the honor by a faculty member, and the
request will be reviewed by the student’s major department (or the equivalent). In
general, the following guidelines should be used in the departmental review:
- The student earned at least 90 semester hours of credit toward the degree, at least 30 of which were completed at UGA;
- The student had been admitted to the major in which the degree is sought and had earned at least 12 semester hours of upper-division coursework in the major; and,
- The student’s University of Georgia (cumulative) grade point average was at least
a 2.0.
By recommending a student for a posthumous degree, the department is agreeing to waive any remaining requirements for graduation.
- If the request is supported by the student’s department, it will be forwarded to the school/college. The appropriate committee or individual in the schoo/college will consider the merits of the case and determine whether the degree shall be forwarded for approval. If the request for a degree is granted, the school/college shall notify the Registrar’s Office and the Division of Student Affairs. These offices will then ensure that the student’s name is included in the next commencement exercises and that the student’s family is notified of the granting of the degree.
- In cases in which the request is not supported all the way through the school/college,
the faculty member or department may submit a petition to the petitions subcommittee
of the Educational Affairs Committee of University Council to request the granting
of the degree. Generally, there should be extenuating circumstances or additional
evidence of accomplishments at UGA that would warrant the granting of the degree when
the guidelines above have not been met.
A certificate of attendance shall be issued to the families of deceased students who have attended the University of Georgia but do not meet the qualifications for a posthumous degree. (Approved by University Council February 6, 2003)
- The deceased student will be recommended for the honor by a faculty member, and the
request will be reviewed by the student’s major department (or the equivalent). In
general, the following guidelines should be used in the departmental review:
- General Procedures
The EAC subcommittee decision(s) on student petitions shall be transmitted in writing to the student within ten UGA working days after the subcommittee action. A subcommittee's decision can be appealed by the student to the President of the University of Georgia. Such an appeal must be provided to the Office of the President in writing no later than thirty calendar days after the student has received the decision. The information on how to appeal a decision must be transmitted to the student with the written decision. Instructors, department heads, directors, and deans may not appeal decisions made by the Educational Affairs Committee.
Source:Bylaws of the University Council of the University of Georgia -- adopted by the Educational Affairs Committee May 26, 1988; revised March 6, 1989, September 20, 1989, May 29, 1990, March 24, 2000, February 6, 2003, March 29, 2006.
Section 4.05-02
Hearing Procedures – Educational Affairs Committee Policy
Policy
A student who petitions the Educational Affairs Committee on an academic matter will
have the petition considered by the petitions subcommittee of the full committee.
A student who wishes to address the appeals body orally must make the request in the
written appeal. The purpose of an oral presentation is to provide an opportunity for
individuals who may communicate more effectively orally than in writing to supplement
their written appeal. If the student is scheduled to meet with the Subcommittee members,
appropriate individuals against which the appeal is directed will be afforded the
opportunity to attend the hearing. The letter of petition should state the decision
desired by the student and the reasons the student believes that decision is justified.
The petition must be signed by the student making the appeal.
When a hearing is to occur on the case, the following rules will apply:
- The student and all involved parties will be notified of the date, time, and place of the hearing.
- The hearing will be recorded. Recording equipment will be provided by the Educational Affairs Committee. The recording will be placed in the student file for a period of one year. The student may request to hear the recording to use in any appeal of the petition.
- Prior to the hearing, the student may review the written material in the file which will be provided to the petitions subcommittee of the Educational Affairs Committee which will hear the case. The material will be available to the student at least 48 hours prior to the hearing. If requested in writing, a copy of the file will be given to the student for appeal purposes.
- The appeal will be heard by members of the petitions subcommittee of the Educational Affairs Committee. This is a three-person panel comprised of faculty members of the full committee.
- Faculty members on the Educational Affairs Committee designated as members of the
petitions subcommittee will be excused from service on a particular case under the
following circumstances:
- If they have a personal or professional relationship with any party to the case which would preclude them from rendering an objective judgment in the case.
- If the case involves a faculty member in the same department or promotion unit as a member of the subcommittee.
- If the case involves an appeal from a department, college, or school committee in which the faculty member has participated.
- Hearings shall be closed and attended only by essential parties, as determined by the chair of the subcommittee.
- If an oral hearing is to be held, the chair of the subcommittee will decide whether the student and respondent will appear separately or together. Parties will not be permitted to crossexamine each other during the hearing. Formal legal rules of evidence do not apply in hearings on academic matters.
- The chair of the subcommittee will determine the order of appearance by the student and other parties including any faculty or other university personnel who are respondents.
- When the subcommittee has received the information it deems necessary to render a decision in a case, it shall determine by majority vote of the subcommittee members what the decision will be. Only subcommittee members may vote in the decision of a case. The decision will be transmitted in writing to the student within ten (10) working days after the subcommittee action. The subcommittee's decision can be appealed by the student to the President of the University of Georgia. Such an appeal must be provided to the Office of the President in writing no later than (30) calendar days after the student has received the decision of the Petitions Subcommittee.
Section 4.05-03
Routing of Academic Appeals
Policy
University of Georgia students have rights to appeal decisions on academic matters.
The following information is designed to indicate where to begin appeals and how the
appeal process works.
Academic decisions at the University of Georgia may occur at several levels: instructor, department, college or school, or the university. An appeal may originate with respect to the actions of an instructor, with a department, a school or college, or at the university level. An appeal begins at the level at which the decision was made. If the student is dissatisfied with a negative decision and wants to appeal further, the student must progress to successive levels of the appeals process as defined in the Guidelines for Routing of Academic Appeals. An appeal must be made within thirty days after receiving the written ruling.
The precise procedures for beginning an appeal may vary by the department or school/college. Students who have a matter they may wish to appeal should ask the department head or college or school dean what procedures are used. At the University level, appeals are considered by the petitions subcommittee of the Educational Affairs Committee of the University Council. Decisions by the petitions subcommittee may be appealed by the student successively to the President of the University and except for grade appeals the Board of Regents.
The appeal route for the following academic decisions is as follows:
Academic Decision | Appeal Route |
---|---|
Grades | Instructor, and then, if unresolved to the Department Head, Dean, Educational Affairs Committee, and President. Grades are appealed within the department and school/college in which they are earned, not in the department and school/college in which the student's major resides. Beyond the instructional-unit level, graduate students' next line of appeal is to the Graduate School. |
Department Curriculum Requirements | Department, Dean, EAC, President |
College or School Curriculum Requirements | College or School, EAC, President |
University Curriculum Requirements | Educational Affairs Committee, President |
University Resident Requirements for Graduation | Educational Affairs Committee, President |
Grievances | Instructor, then Department Head. Grievances which pertain to discrimination prohibited under the law are considered by the Equal Opportunity Office. Other student grievances on academic matters go from the department to the school/college and then to the Educational Affairs Committee. If a school/college has no grievance procedure a student may appeal a grievance at the department-level directly to the Educational Affairs Committee, President |
Accuracy of Academic Records | The University's policy on the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act covers appeals on this matter. |
Second Dismissal | Educational Affairs Committee, President |
First Dismissal | College or School, except Learning Support which goes directly to the Educational Affairs Committee, President |
Source:Adopted, Educational Affairs Committee, September 20, 1989. Revised, Educational Affairs Committee, November 8, 1989, March 24, 2000, March 29, 2006.
EAC Members 2024 - 2025
Agricultural and Environmental Sciences | Susana Ferreira | 2026 |
Arts and Sciences | Erin Dolan | 2025 |
Arts and Sciences | Jennifer Rice (chair) | 2025 |
Business | Laura Little |
2026 |
Business | Margaret Christ |
2025 |
Education |
Janette Hill | 2025 |
Engineering |
Brock Woodson | 2025 |
Social Work |
Rachel Fusco | 2026 |
Family and Consumer Sciences | Suraj Sharma | 2026 |
Forestry and Natural Resources |
Nick Fuhrman | 2025 |
Journalism and Mass Communication | Glenna Read | 2027 |
Public and International Affairs | Alexa Bankert | 2026 |
Veterinary Medicine (also representing Pharmacy and Law) |
Susan Sanchez | 2026 |
Ex-Officio Member | Provost S. Jack Hu | Indefinite |
Undergraduate Student Representative | Rayna Carter | 2025 |
Graduate Student Representative | Marggie Vazquez | 2025 |